Russian Nuclear Horn Sends Warning To Babylon

UFO? They’re Russia’s WW3 Nuke Weapons

@MORNINGNEWSUSA
PUBLISHED: 4:37 PM, DEC 17, 2015 UPDATED: 4:40 PM, DEC 17, 2015

Russia conducted 12 tests of its nuclear missile program being prepared in the event of World War 3. Its next step might be to launch these nuclear missiles from space.

The country had announced its satellites can now aim precision weapons, fixing targets while calculating the topographical specifics of the area. All data retrieved were transmitted and uploaded to a computer used to control missiles. These satellites have actually been used in its airstrikes in Syria.

Siberians reported various UFO sightings in November. Some of them were uploading videos on YouTube as proof of the supposed aliens visiting the Earth.

However, a rocket scientist said the “UFO sightings” were actually test firings of a “bizarre Russian missile program to develop defense-penetrating warheads.” James Oberg, who worked for 22 years for NASA and witnessed various rocket launching in Siberia and Kazakhstan, told the Huffington Post that missile tests conducted by the U.S. and Russia had always been mistaken as UFOs.

“The just-launched missile coasts for several minutes and then fires its last stage pushing the warhead downwards into a special radar test range. The plume, then actually higher in the sky, gets to be more than 100 miles long, perhaps 500-600 miles in space before falling back into the atmosphere,” Ober told The Huffington Post in an email. The most recent sighting in Siberia was the twelfth testing of the missile, Oberg noted. “Half of the tests have occurred within an hour of sunset. For millions of people along the route, a triangle cloud suddenly appears from nowhere and grows for 60 seconds. Then the nose flares into a brief spiral and fades away,” he outlined.

The bizarre missile could be the Topol, Daily Star concluded. It is a long-range stealth nuclear missile that could penetrate any NATO missile shield in the event that World War 3 happens. As previously reported by the Morning News USA, the U.S. and NATO are working together in building a global missile shield defense system across borders of the Alliance. Russian president Vladimir Putin vowed to build a weapon that could penetrate this.

On Dec. 14, Russia Beyond The Headlines reports that Russian satellites can now monitor Syria and expansive coastal waters surrounding it. The Turkish-Syrian Border is also being monitored, the report said. In the coming days, Russia’s Defense Ministry will be linked into its own satellites that can control navy ships, submarines, aircraft and ground units, the report outlines.

The Truth About The Fire (Revelation 15)

30 November, 2015 by Andrew the Prophet

World War 3: What would REALLY happen in a nuclear war, by experts

Rob WaughRob Waugh for Metro.co.uk
Wednesday 25 Nov 2015 5:04 pm

The words ‘World War 3’ trended on social media worldwide as tension rose over Turkey shooting down a Russian jet over its airspace.

Just to keep everything calm and civilised, Russian military analyst Pavel Felgenhauer said that nuclear war was now ‘likely’.

There are still a huge number of nuclear weapons in active service – the Arms Control Association estimates that Russia has 7,700 weapons in service, of which 4,500 are stockpiled, and 1548 are deployed on missiles and at air bases.

But what would actually happen?

1) We wouldn’t hear a ‘four-minute warning’

The four minute warning system, a national system of sirens which would have gone off during a nuclear attack was retired in 1992 – one of the reasons being that more people now have double glazing.

2) Instead, you will probably get a text message

An Apple Inc. iPhone 6S smartphone is held for an arranged photograph in Hong Kong, China, on Friday, Sept. 25, 2015. The latest models, following last year’s hugely popular design overhaul that added bigger screens, may not match the success of previous releases, according to analysts.
The government has tested technology which would deliver a text message warning of disasters such as nuclear attacks.

The system, drawn up by the National Security Council, was tested in Glasgow and Yorkshire in 2013.

3) By the time you get the message, there may be little you can do

As yet, there is no technology which can stop an intercontinental ballistic missile – so the most many of us could hope for would be time to get indoors.

Even during the time of the ‘four minute’ warning, the warning would probably have offered just three minutes.

4) If you’re near the bomb, there won’t be much left of you

Witnesses of the Hiroshima attack said that people near the centre of the blast ‘vanished’.
William Burchett said, ‘Of thousands of others, nearer the centre of the explosion, there was no trace. They vanished. The theory in Hiroshima is that the atomic heat was so great that they burned instantly to ashes – except that there were no ashes.’

The bomb dropped on Hiroshima was a fraction of the size of the hydrogen warheads now used by Russia and the U.S.

5) Hydrogen bombs could devastate entire cities

Nearly six million people dead, homes flattened and millions more poisoned by a huge plume of radioactive poison which would spread for 130 miles.

An app by Alex Wellerstein at the Stevens Institute of Technology, Nuke Map, shows what could happen if the largest Soviet hydrogen bomb ever detonated was dropped on London.
Destruction would spread from Horsham in the South to Luton in the north – and casualties would spiral after the initial blast killed and injured nearly 10 million people.

6) Large-scale nuclear war could devastate the entire world

In 1979, the U.S. Congress’s Office of Technology published a report called The Effects of War, which envisaged the impact of an all-out nuclear attack.

The consequences would be disastrous – with hundreds of millions of people dead, and more facing cancer and radiation sickness.

The OTA envisaged up to 80% of the population of the U.S. being killed immediately, with further casualties from radiation.

7) The first impacts wouldn’t be the worst part

A British government broadcast, recorded to be broadcast in the event of nuclear war, said, ‘This is the Wartime Broadcasting Service. This country has been attacked with nuclear weapons… Remember there is nothing to be gained by trying to get away. By leaving your homes you could be exposing yourself to greater danger.If you leave, you may find yourself without food, without water, without accommodation and without protection. Radioactive fall-out, which follows a nuclear explosion, is many times more dangerous if you are directly exposed to it in the open….’
Longstanding advice from various government agencies includes:

Seeking shelter (ideally below ground and surrounded by thick concrete)
Rationing supplies of food, water, fuel, medicine and clothing

Wearing hats and goggles and exposing as little skin to the air as possible
Following the news and evacuating if ordered

8) The environment would be devastated for decades afterwards

‘Doomsday’ predictions of all life on Earth being exterminated are probably over-stating the impact of nuclear weapons – but it would have a huge impact on life on our planet.

A serious nuclear conflict would also leave the world far worse off than depicted in games such as Fallout 4, says science magazine Smithsonian.com.

Carbon thrown into the air would cause a huge drop in worldwide temperature, and could hit global rainfall and the growing seasons for crops.