The Scarlet Woman Is Off The Hook (Rev 17:4)

  

DOJ: No, We Weren’t Asked To Launch A Criminal Probe Into Clinton’s Emails
Catherine Thompson

JULY 24, 2015

The U.S. Justice Department said Friday that, contrary to media reports, it did not receive a request to open a criminal investigation into how sensitive information was handled in Hillary Clinton’s private emails.

The New York Times reported Thursday that two inspectors general asked the Justice Department “to open a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state.” The language of that report originally cast Clinton as a target of the requested probe, but notably was changed after Times reporters received complaints from Clinton’s presidential campaign.

The agency now says that it what it received was “not a criminal referral,” but a request related to the potential compromise of classified information, according to Washington Post report Sari Horowitz:
The Department of Justice now correcting their earlier statement & saying the referral regarding Clinton emails was not a criminal inquiry.

10:17 AM – 24 Jul 2015

Correct from DOJ:Dept has received a referral related to the potential compromise of classified information. It is not a criminal referral.”

10:23 AM – 24 Jul 2015

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), the top Democrat on the select House committee investigating the Benghazi attacks, also rejected the notion that the inspectors general of the State Department and intelligence agencies asked for a criminal probe into Clinton’s email account.

“I spoke personally to the State Department inspector general on Thursday, and he said he never asked the Justice Department to launch a criminal investigation of Secretary Clinton’s email usage,” Cummings said in a statement, as quoted by The Hill.

Cummings added that the State Department inspector general “told me the Intelligence Community IG notified the Justice Department and Congress that they identified classified information in a few emails that were part of the [Freedom of Information Act] review, and that none of those emails had been previously marked as classified,” according to The Hill.

Google Knows Who The Scarlet Woman Will Be (Rev 17:4)

  

Google says Hillary Clinton will be the next president

Search engine optimization can be a peculiar thing. But conspiracy theorists will surely enjoy these results.

by Chris Matyszczyk @ChrisMatyszczyk
June 25, 2015 4:20 PM PDT

Google, be blessed.

You have given me almost two more years of my life that I never thought I’d have. You have saved me from endless hours and days of purgatorial pain. You have offered me closure, even before the doomed affair had truly begun.

My apologies. I’m not wrecked on Retsina. I’m merely reading reports that Google’s very fine search engine has already indicated that Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States.
Of course, there’s a touch of hyperbole here. But I suspect there might be one or two political partisans who will be experiencing intensely hyperbolic reactions when they hear of it.

You see, Google search has responded to the question: “Who will be the next president?” with a card that answered: Hillary Clinton.

I know, I know. You were still holding out for either Ted Nugent or the Hulk Hoganesque intellect of Donald Trump.

Instead, as the Next Web reported, two formulations of the same question both throw up results that suggest that in 2016, the revolution will be Clintonized.

Nerds will surely rush to explain that Google’s search engine reacts to optimized results, and these two happened to be results that appear to be — but aren’t — definitive answers. One, after all, is from renowned independently-minded performer Glen Beck.

I have contacted Google to ask for a definitive answer and will update. However, my own searches don’t throw up that definitive card anymore.

There is no suggestion that Google’s engineers are machinating to offer a coronation before the 18-month ululation.

I suspect, though, that a few conspiracy theorists will be ready to offer concerns about Google’s alleged dark arts.

One imagines that a sizable proportion of Google’s youthful staff might lean more to port than starboard. However, let me toss in one exalted conspiracy theory, merely for the amusement of those who cannot get enough of them .

Wouldn’t it be delicious if this was a ploy by Bernie Sanders supporters to combat the notion that the Clinton nomination is a foregone conclusion?