Merve Sebnum Oruc
Hashd al-Shaabi is a frequently heard name along with the start of the Mosul Operation. Yet its roots date further back in time. The Hashd al-Shaabi, which can be translated as “Popular Mobilization Forces,” is an umbrella organization under which at least 40 militia groups are gathered. While the history of part of these militia groups go all the way back to before the ousting of Saddam Hussein, a significant number of them were founded during the period of the U.S.'s invasion of Iraq. For example, as it is possible to say that the Mahdi Army, known to be one of the most recognized and strongest militia forces in Iraq, led by Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr, dates back to 2003, the foundation of one other strong and well-known militia group, the Badr Brigades, dates back to 1982, the Iran-Iraq War. This group, consisting of Shiite Iraqis, who have fallen captive to Iran, or fugitives seeking refuge in Iran, were trained by Iran and have been fighting alongside Iranian soldiers. Ever since then, they are directly armed by Iran and take their orders from Iran. The Badr Brigades leader Hadi al-Amiri is a member of the Iraqi parliament, and he even took office as transportation minister between 2010 and 2014. It is known that he is currently the commander in chief in Hashd al-Shaabi's command echelon. Yet, he also refers to Iran's Quds Force leader Qasem Soleimani as, “My brother, my commander, my leader.”
The Badr Brigades led by Amiri has ties to the Shiite party Iraq Islamic Revolutionary Council currently run by Ammar al-Hakim. However, the word in Iraq is that there is a fight for power between Amiri and Hakim. It is said that the two are in a fight since Hakim stated that his father Ayatollah Muhammad Bakr al-Hakim, who was killed in Najaf in 2003, was the one who founded both the party and the Badr Brigades, so this would make him the real leader, and Amiri boosted his popularity among the Shiites.
It is possible to say that all militia forces in Iraq have a connection to a political party. And each political party has a militia force. This is true for all political groups in Iraq, not only the Shiites. However, Shiites are the strongest because they have the most weapons, the most financial support and the most state connections. While the Sunnis also have their own militia forces, the fury of the Baghdad administration, that is targeting not only Daesh but all Sunnis with totalitarian vengefulness, has rendered these forces weak. Kurds have the Peshmerga, but contrary to other militia forces, the Peshmerga forces are not illegal. This is why the Iraqi Turkmens say, “Everyone has armed forces but us,” because this is the order in Iraq. In short, Iraq is a militia forces state.
The Shiite militia groups uniting under the organization we know as Hashd al-Shaabi and becoming increasingly organized could not really get along well in the past. From time to time they would compete and from time to time they would fight based on their own gains, interests and positions or the agenda of their own political parties. Similarly, their relations with the Iraqi central government and the support they received also differed. For example, term Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki giving an order to attack the Mahdi Army in Basra in 2008, as a result of Mahdi Army leader Sadr opposing al-Maliki's Islamic Dawa Party, is one of the many examples in Iraq's recent history.
It is impossible to say that the idea that brought them together today is to fight against Sunnis. Even though it might be claimed that they started to come together with Ayatollah Ali Sistani's “jihad” fatwa following Mosul's fall to Daesh and the Iraqi army's defeat in 2014, it is known that the idea to found an the umbrella organization Hashd al-Shaabi goes back beyond Sistani's fatwa. It was revealed in a meeting between Maliki and Amiri this summer that the “known truth” of the decision to unite Shiite militias under a single roof was taken months before this incident, at the Shiite bloc meeting in April 2014.
Meanwhile, it should be noted that we mentioned groups that have had different attitudes to date in terms of religious and political relations with Iran. For example, even though Badr's founder al-Hakim family and Maliki's Islamic Dawa Party's leaders fled to Iran during the Gulf War and remained there until the U.S.'s invasion, Sadr and his family continued to live in Iraq throughout the time Saddam was in rule and the he was ousted. The Sadr family remained in Iraq because they saw great support from among the Shiites. Muqteda al-Sadr calling U.S. troops to leave Iraq and standing against invasion following Saddam's ouster was one reason for his popularity as was his different stance compared to other Shiite militias.
It is also known that the Iraqi Shiite's religious leader Sistani criticizes the “Wilayet e Faqih” term and holds different opinions in terms of religion and running political businesses. Yet still, today all these organizations are united under the same roof and are fighting against the Sunnis.
The past human rights violations of the Shiite militias who are known to have committed numerous atrocities no different to Daesh were not very different from those committed today. This process that has led Daesh to be greeted by the Sunnis in Iraq with flags is the result of the sectarian and vengeful attacks and tortures by these militia forces, which have become strong both within and outside the Iraqi army. With increased influence of these groups whose official relationship with the state go back to the paramilitary Special Security Apparatus of the State founded by the Americans in 2003, in 2006, term Interior Minister Maliki had asked political parties to dissolve their militia groups as a result of U.S. pressures. Of course this was not acted upon and the ministry took no steps in this direction. On the contrary, Maliki made a statement entirely the opposite of this and continued to protect Shiite militia groups. When you turn on Baghdad television today, you can see how Iraq's Shiite militia groups were defended by Maliki. And you can understand how Iraq's future, with Iran on one side and Baghdad on the other, has been taken hostage by bloody gangs.
No comments:
Post a Comment