Mossad Targets Nuclear Engineers in Damascus: Report
Foreign Policy Journal
by Franklin Lamb | November 17, 2014
DAMASCUS, Nov. 15, 2014 — With less than two weeks run-up to the
‘deadline’ for Iran and the P-5 + 1 to negotiate a final agreement, the
ninth set of talks between the parties on the nuclear issue,
Mossad has assassinated a team of five nuclear weapons specialists in Damascus, the leader of whom was Iranian.
This according to one of the authors of the just published Naame
Shaam’s report: “Iran in Syria: From an Ally of the Regime to an
Occupying Force”, which levels many accusations against Iran’s
leadership and
accuses the Islamic Republic of “occupying” Syria in order to fill in its “Shia Crescent” trajectory from Yemen to Lebanon.
The five engineers were reportedly being watched for weeks as they
would arrive one at a time daily to their secured work quarters without
guards and in plain clothes in order not to attract attention. Mossad is
widely known to have many agents among the opponents of the regime
across Syria as it watches Iranian projects.
By its own admission, the Proverbs 24:6 “By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War” organization has watchers up close at other nuclear facilities outside Iran, where the Islamic Republic has sent specialized personnel in Syria and Iraq.
The US Intelligence Community, comprised of 16 intelligence agencies,
nearly a year ago advised the White House that Iran is purposely
stalling for time by issuing a series of ‘warm-cold’ assessments of the
nuclear file talks while operating nuclear engineering facilities in
both Iraq and Syria preparing to construct nuclear weapons. Offering his
services for the effort to torpedo an agreement, enter one Matthew
Levitt, a frequent “expert witness” at various US Congressional
hearings, and the director Counterterrorism and Intelligence at the
Zionist Washington Institute.
This time appearing before the before the House Committee on Financial Services, formerly known as the House
Banking
Committee on November 13, Levitt scoffed at the November 12 denial by
Iran to the Iranian public of a report that one of its nuclear
scientists was killed. “There are no Iranian nuclear scientists in
Syria,” said Deputy Foreign Minister Hassan Ghashghavi, quoted by state
news agency IRNA.
Following his testimony, Levitt reportedly expanded his comments with
Congressmen and staffers, not on the supposed subject of his testimony
which was how to degrade ISIS
finances,
but rather on Israel’s effort to scuttle the P5 + 1 talks, which he and
many in Washington and Tehran reportedly hope will fail again.
“The
US and their close Israeli allies knew exactly what Iran was doing and
also what it continues to do in Iraq and Syria to advance its
bomb-building obsession. So Israel sent them a message to the Mullahs
and there will be more messages and there will be more sanctions.”
All members of Congress attending the hearing favored President
Obama’s Extending the National Emergency Act regarding Iran, a move
pushed by Vice President Joe Biden and his potential adversary in the
2016 Presidential race, Hillary Clinton. The extension keeps sanctions
against the Islamic Republic in place for at least another year, the
36th annual extension since Jimmy Carter declared a state of emergency
concerning Iran in response to the takeover of the former US embassy in
Tehran.
When asked about Iranian Presidents Rouhani’s statement this week
that the US sanctions are “The rusted weapon of sanctions are no longer
effective” as both sides employ a variety of psychological tactics to
explain to their constituencies why a deal has failed, one hearing
attendee was told by an aide to Committee Chair Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex):
“it’s true that the sanctions have had modest political effects on the
regime but they are taking a big toll and Rohani’s claim of US sanctions
being no longer effective is not reflected in the economic statistics
which the Iranian public grasps even as the Mullahs still live high on
the hog”.
It is true that Iranian officials generally tend to avoid blaming the
sanctions or Iran’s foreign policy for economic hardship, as that might
be interpreted as a victory for the West. Instead, they often focus on
mismanagement, corruption and ‘unwise management’.
One of the handouts distributed after the hearing included recent
statistics AIPAC sent to every Congressman backing up its assurances
that the sanctions are doing a great job for America and her allies but
need to be ratcheted up hard. Israel and its US Congressional partners
want the US and its allies to intensify their strategy of not so slowly
bleeding Iran and Hezbollah in Syria as to quickly advance the “Syria
must become the Vietnam of Iran and Hezbollah” policy.
This action is urged even though the people of Syria, and to a much
lesser extent, the people of Iran, will continue to pay the price.
But the White House is yet
to publicly admit that it is actively involved in a proxy war against
the Iranian regime, because Barack Obama wants to avoid Zionist lobby
pressure to prematurely take concrete military steps to end the
bloodshed.
The impact of US-led sanctions on the Iranian economy, which the
Congressional committee estimates at well over 120 billion US dollars as
of June 1, 2014, rather than being “rusty”, as Rohani claims, is
enormous according to the US Treasury Department’s Office of Financial
Assets Control (OFAC).
AIPAC photo handouts after the hearing included scenes of hundreds of
Iranian citizens daily lining up for food supplies in Tehran.
According to AIPAC, as well as the Washington Institute for Near East
Policy (WINEP), and Naame Shaam, one key indicator of the economic
burden is the inflation rate, which has more than tripled in the last
five years (from 10 percent in 2009 to over 35 percent in 2014) and has
increased by about 11 percent since the start of the war in Syria.
Official reports also indicate that Iranian household purchasing
power has decreased by about 27 percent. BBC Persian in March 2014
published a list of basic
food items
claiming that consumer prices in Iran had at least tripled in the past
four or five years. According to a July 2014 report of the Iranian
Ministry of the Economy,
31 percent of all Iranians live below the poverty line. Three
months before, in March 2014, Iranian MP Mousareza Servati declared
that “15 million Iranians (about 20 percent of the population) are
living below the national poverty line. Seven million of them are not
receiving assistance of any kind.”
A hand-out document at the hearing also emphasized the following:
- Despite Iranian media’s celebration of President Hassan Rouhani’s economic ‘achievements ‘the
reality is that Iran’s economic problems are unlikely to go away any
time soon unless there are fundamental shifts in its foreign policies, which Washington and its allies do not believe will happen until regime change happens.
- In March 2014, The New York Times published an article titled “Hopes
fade for surge in the economy.” The article argued that people in Iran
had voted for President Rouhani in the hope for a revival of the
country’s ailing economy. But more than six months after he took office,
“hopes of a quick economic recovery are fading, while economists say
the government is running out of cash.” On taking office, he discovered
that the government’s finances were in far worse condition than his
predecessor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had ever let on. Now, with a lack of
petrodollars and declining tax revenues, Mr. Rouhani has little option
but to take steps that in the short-run will only increase the pain for
the voters who put him into office. The article also quotes Saeed
Laylaz, an economist advisor to President Rouhani, saying Iran is heading to a “black spring” and only a “miracle” could save it from political damage caused by the economic problems. “I am worried we might witness turmoil, civil unrest or worse,” he added.
- According to the UK Economist and other media reports Iran is so
short of cash that the government has “no other option” but to take
“painful steps” such as printing
money (therefore pushing inflation further up) and cutting down on
public spending. While phasing out energy subsidies and cutting back on
social assistance payments to nearly 60 million poor Iranians (about 12
US dollars a month), Iran has been sending millions of tons of food and
cash to Syria and increasingly the Iranian public is complaining.
Consequently the sanctions will remain and be intensified according
to the House Committee on Financial Services. Meanwhile the Mossad is
watching closely Iran’s activities in Iraq, Syria and now Lebanon and
has once more telegraphed its intentions to continue its serial
violations of those countries’ sovereignty while implementing other
projects in order to eliminate what it sees as Iran’s threat to its
existence.