Scarlet Woman Gains Serious Momentum After Hearing (Rev 17)

Even conservatives admit the Benghazi hearing was a win for Hillary Clinton

BY KIMBERLY TRUONG

After withstanding 11 grueling hours of questioning by the House Select Committee on Benghazi on her role in the 2012 attack on the U.S. Embassy there, Hillary Clinton is receiving extensive praise — including from some conservatives.

Reactions to the hearing range from commending Clinton’s poise to marveling at how she came out relatively unscathed. Albeit begrudgingly, those on the right, too, are admitting that Clinton came out on top.

In fact, many conservative figures joined in on the common refrain — Clinton showed resolve while Republicans on the panel were distracted, fighting with each other.

“In terms of the narrative on Benghazi, there was no major new development that rocked her side of the story, that changes this in some way,” said Ed Henry of Fox News. “What you have here is another big test for Hillary Clinton, and another big test that she appears to have passed.”

The Washington Examiner’s Byron York more or less agreed — “a hearing billed as an epic, High Noon-style confrontation,” he says, “instead turned out to be a somewhat interesting look at a few limited aspects of the Benghazi affair. In other words, no big deal. And that is very, very good news for Hillary Clinton.”

Ashe Schow, also of the Washington Examiner, chimed in with a piece for Observer News titled, “Sorry, Republicans, Clinton Won the Benghazi Hearing.”

“Republicans had one last great chance to get some answers from the former secretary of state, and they failed,” she wrote.

Several also lamented that the hearings were, as RedState’s Erick Erickson said, “a waste of time.”
“Most of the rest of the committee just wants to grandstand for the folks back home as either prosecutors of or defenders of Hillary Clinton,” he wrote. “Mrs. Clinton too is far too bright to be trapped in this or any questions.”

Even Rep. Trey Gowdy, chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, acknowledged that the hearings yielded nothing new.

When asked by reporters what details emerged from the 11 hours of questioning, Gowdy said, “I think some of Jimmy Jordan’s questioning — well, when you say new today, we knew some of that already. We knew about the emails.”

“In terms of her testimony? I don’t know that she testified that much differently today than she has the previous time she testified.”

As for Clinton’s supporters, donor Pamela Eakes told the Associated Press: “We’re grateful to Republicans for giving her the best week ever.”

The Scarlet Woman Looking Presidential Even At Hearing (Rev 17:4)

Analysis: Clinton seeks to look presidential in hearing

By JULIE PACE

AP White House CorrespondentWASHINGTON (AP) – With a calm demeanor and detailed answers, Hillary Rodham Clinton sought to turn an hours-long congressional grilling on the deadly Benghazi attacks into an opportunity to look more presidential than political.
Clinton, the front-runner for the 2016 Democratic nomination, used her opening remarks Thursday to urge lawmakers to “reach for statesmanship” and rise above partisanship. When asked by a friendly lawmaker how it felt to be accused of contributing to the deaths of four Americans, she spoke in a soft tone about the emotional toll of the 2012 attacks.

“I imagine I’ve thought more about what happened than all of you put together,” Clinton said. “I’ve lost more sleep than all of you put together.”

And when the committee’s Republican chairman and top Democratic member heatedly argued about making public the panel’s earlier private hearings, Clinton sat back with an amused smile on her face for several minutes. She appeared more than happy to stay out of a partisan spat that seemed to bolster her campaign’s contention that the hearing was more about politics than uncovering new information about the violence in Libya.

Clinton was largely unflappable through more than five hours of testimony that stretched into Thursday evening.

For Clinton, the hearing in the cavernous House committee room was a setting that played to her strengths. She’s long been more comfortable delving into detailed policy discussions than giving lofty speeches or engaging in other trappings of political campaigns. And she’s often been at her best when she has an opponent with whom to draw a contrast – in this case, a Republican-led committee.

To be sure, Clinton was sharply challenged by GOP lawmakers on a range of issues, from requests for additional security at the Benghazi compound that went unfulfilled to her frequent email exchanges about Libya with Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime Clinton friend who had no role at the State Department.

Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan also revived questions about the Obama administration’s shifting accounts of what happened at the diplomatic outpost in Benghazi and nearby CIA compound, positing that the White House was eager to avoid political damage from a terror attack less than two months before President Barack Obama faced re-election.

“I’m sorry it doesn’t fit your narrative, congressman,” Clinton said in response. “I can only tell you what the facts are.”

Clinton’s daylong testimony was unlikely to end Republicans’ quest to use the heavily scrutinized Benghazi attack to question her judgment and leadership. Revelations that Clinton relied on personal email and a private Internet server during her tenure at the State Department have only heightened the GOP’s interest in determining whether more information exists about the attack that killed Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, and three other Americans.

Clinton’s competent performance was also unlikely to drastically affect her standing in the Democratic race, where she faces a challenge from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. Nearly half of Democrats and a majority of independents said they don’t have strong feelings about the Benghazi investigation, according to a new AP-GfK poll.

Still, emerging from the hearing largely unscathed will likely contribute to a sense of momentum around Clinton’s presidential bid. After an uneven start to her campaign that sparked anxiety among some Democrats, Clinton rebounded with a strong debate performance earlier this month. On Wednesday, Vice President Joe Biden announced he wouldn’t make a late entry into the race and challenge Clinton for nomination.

Clinton’s advisers has long viewed the Benghazi hearing as a key hurdle as they seek to steady her campaign ahead of early voting contests in Iowa and New Hampshire. The campaign’s expectations for the hearing only increased after Rep. Kevin McCarthy, the No. 2 Republican in the House, said the committee had hurt Clinton’s poll numbers, helping bolster Democrats’ contention that the Benghazi investigations were motivated by politics.

Clinton’s team also saw the hearing as an opportunity to present herself as a seasoned diplomat and harken back to her days in the State Department, when her popularity soared and she won accolades from some of the Republicans now running against her in the White House contest.

She ticked through details of the administration’s policy toward Libya, where the U.S. invested significant resources to help rebels remove longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi from power. And she described numerous urgent conversations with the White House and CIA the night of the Benghazi attack.

Throughout her testimony, Clinton was slipped notes from longtime aide Cheryl Mills, prompting Rep. Peter Roskam, R-Ill., to say he could pause his questioning so she could read the messages.

Appearing to find Roskam’s offer condescending, Clinton replied coolly, “I can do more than one thing at a time.”

__

Julie Pace has covered the White House and politics for The Associated Press since 2009. Follow her at http://twitter.com/jpaceDC