Showing posts with label aggression. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aggression. Show all posts

Monday, October 17, 2016

The Aggression Of The Scarlet Woman (Revelation 17)

BY NOMAAN MERCHANT
OCT. 14, 2016 1:50 AM EDT
BEIJING (AP) — Hillary Clinton privately said the U.S. would "ring China with missile defense" if the Chinese government failed to curb North Korea's nuclear program, a potential hint at how the former secretary of state would act if elected president.
Clinton's remarks were revealed by WikiLeaks in a hack of the Clinton campaign chairman's personal account. The emails include a document excerpting Clinton's private speech transcripts, which she has refused to release.
A section on China features several issues in which Clinton said she confronted the Chinese while leading the U.S. State Department.
China has harshly criticized the U.S. and South Korea's planned deployment of a missile-defense system against North Korea, which conducted its fifth nuclear test this year. But Clinton said she told Chinese officials that the U.S. might deploy additional ships to the region to contain the North Korean missile threat.
If North Korea successfully obtains a ballistic missile, it could threaten not just American allies in the Pacific, "but they could actually reach Hawaii and the west coast theoretically," Clinton said.
"We're going to ring China with missile defense. We're going to put more of our fleet in the area," Clinton said in a 2013 speech. "So China, come on. You either control them or we're going to have to defend against them."
China is North Korea's economic lifeline and the closest thing it has to a diplomatic ally, and has been criticized by the U.S. and others for not doing enough to rein in Pyongyang's nuclear ambitions. Chinese officials and state media have responded by saying North Korea is not solely China's responsibility and say Beijing's has limited influence with secretive leader Kim Jong Un's hardline communist regime
Clinton also privately criticized China's position on another sensitive issue, the South China Sea. China claims almost the entirety of the strategically vital waterbody has lashed out at an international tribunal's rejection of its claims in a July ruling.
"My counterpart sat up very straight and goes, 'Well, you can't do that,'" she said. "And I said, 'Well, we have as much right to claim that as you do. I mean, you claim (the South China Sea) based on pottery shards from, you know, some fishing vessel that ran aground in an atoll somewhere."
In another remark revealed in the Wikileaks hack, Clinton called Xi "a more sophisticated, more effective public leader" than his predecessor, Hu Jintao. She noted Xi's plans for economic and social reforms, but blamed what she called "a resurgence of nationalism" on the Chinese government.
China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond Friday to faxed questions about Clinton's remarks.
As secretary of state, Clinton visited China seven times and engineered Washington's "pivot" to Asia, which has long been viewed with suspicion by Beijing. The policy shift has seen a tighter focus on the region along with an increased military presence and fortified alliances with allies such as Australia and the Philippines, although the latter has been cast in doubt with the election of China-friendly President Rodrigo Duterte.
She also drew condemnation from Chinese state media last year after describing Xi as "shameless" as he prepared to speak on women's rights at the United Nations, shortly after China detained five young feminists who'd campaigned against domestic violence.
___

Sunday, November 16, 2014

Danger From The Russian Nuclear Horn

Danger of Russian Aggression Outweighs Nuclear Danger

russia-nuclear-icbm-bases
New York Times

Kevin Ryan is director of defense and intelligence projects at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
November 14, 2014

Until Russia removes its troops from eastern Ukraine and ceases its military support to pro-Russian separatists there, the United States should suspend any discussion on future arms reductions or cooperation on securing Russian nuclear materials and weapons.

The U.S. could continue to meet its obligations for nuclear weapons reductions under the New Start treaty.

This would, for all practical purposes, end such cooperation. But the threat from Russian adventurism in Eastern Europe outweighs the potential threat from loose nuclear material.

The United States could continue to meet its obligations for nuclear reductions under the New START treaty, which include reducing strategic nuclear warheads to 1,550 by 2018 and participating in verification inspections with Russia. But Russia has said that no new cooperative projects in Russia are “envisioned” in 2015, and U.S. officials have canceled some meetings and lab visits with Russia.

According to the Congressional Research Service, the United States has spent more than $9 billion to better secure Russian nuclear weapons and materials – all of which greatly benefited American security. But today the threat from Russian proliferation is greatly diminished and the United States has already significantly reduced the amount of money it is spending in Russia on nuclear security improvements.

In addition, Russia today is no longer the financial basket case it once was. It is now able to spend an ever increasing amount of money on its own military budget.

These facts alone would be a strong argument to end American subsidies for Russian security efforts but, when viewed in the context of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and its provocative actions toward Europe and the United States, the choice should be clear.