US, South Korea sign new nuclear pact
By Ben McGrath
25 April 2015
The
United States and South Korea reached an agreement on the latter’s
nuclear program this week after nearly five years of negotiations. The
deal will allow South Korea to expand its nuclear activities, softening
previous provisions designed to prevent Seoul’s development of nuclear
weapons.
The
pact was signed Wednesday between US Ambassador to South Korea Mark
Lippert and Park No-byeok, South Korea’s lead negotiator on nuclear
cooperation issues. The 21-point agreement calls for the establishment
of a high-level panel to oversee its implementation. It will expire in
20 years, with the door left open for future amendments.
The treaty still requires the approval of President Obama and the US Congress, as well as South Korean President Park Geun-hye.
Negotiator
Park No-byeok told a news conference following the signing ceremony:
“As the existing accord sealed 40 years ago had various components that
needed to be improved, the new one contains various progress focusing on
three main areas—spent fuel management, a steady fuel supply, and
reactor export promotion.”
The
US embassy in Seoul released a statement saying: “This agreement marks a
major milestone for the US-ROK [Republic of Korea] alliance and
reinforces the alliance as a linchpin of peace and security in the
Asia-Pacific region.”
Negotiations
over South Korea’s nuclear program had been ongoing since 2010. A 1974
agreement was set to expire last year. However, with the two sides at an
impasse, it was extended for two years to give negotiators more time.
South
Korea’s primary concern was to establish its right to enrich uranium
and reprocess spent nuclear fuel rods, both of which will technically
continue to be banned under the new treaty. These processes could provide South Korea with an avenue to produce weapons-grade nuclear material.
New
provisions, however, will allow South Korea to take steps toward
uranium enrichment. Seoul, using material obtained only from the US,
will be able to enrich uranium up to 20 percent under the oversight
panel’s supervision. The agreement further states that future
consultations could be held on this issue. “It is meaningful that we
have opened the pathway for uranium enrichment,” a foreign ministry
official stated on condition of anonymity.
South Korea will also be allowed to conduct research into a type of fuel reprocessing known as pyroprocessing—a method of recycling spent fuel that makes it more difficult to weaponize.
South
Korea argued during the negotiations that the ability to enrich fuel
would allow it to pursue energy deals with other countries. As one
example, Seoul reached an agreement with Saudi Arabia in March to
research the possibility of constructing two nuclear reactors over the
next two decades, a deal valued at $2 billion.
South
Korea, the world’s fifth largest nuclear energy producer, is also
concerned that it is running out of space to store its used fuel rods.
Currently 24 nuclear plants supply nearly 40 percent of the country’s
energy needs and it is estimated that storage facilities will be filled
to capacity within a decade. The new deal allows this spent fuel to be reprocessed in a third country approved by the US.
The United States is concerned that if given the opportunity, South Korea could develop its own nuclear weapons,
thereby eroding Washington’s influence and stoking a regional nuclear
arms race. In 2013, the US expressed similar concerns in relation to
Japan when the latter opened the Rokkasho reprocessing plant, capable of
producing enough weapons-grade plutonium to build 2,000 bombs annually.
The
nuclear deal underscores South Korea’s dependent role within the US
alliance. While making a few relatively minor concessions, the US
continues to dictate what Seoul can and cannot do. The US is hostile to
any alteration to the current relationship because South Korea is
integral to any future war against China.
Washington’s concerns are not unfounded. Numerous figures within the South Korean ruling class have voiced their support for obtaining nuclear weapons.
This includes conservative journalists and former right-wing lawmaker
Song Yeong-seon, a longtime advocate of South Korean nuclear weapons.
Chung Mong-joon, another former Saenuri Party lawmaker, son of the
Hyundai Group founder, and one-time party leader, has also expressed his
backing for such a plan.
In
2013, following North Korea’s third nuclear test, Chung stated during a
speech at the Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference in
Washington that South Korea should consider withdrawing from the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty, which it ratified in 1975, and “match North
Korea’s nuclear progress step by step while committing to stop if North
Korea stops.” Chung claimed: “The only thing that kept the Cold War cold
was the mutual deterrence afforded by nuclear weapons.”
While
the government has never endorsed Chung’s position, the idea has been
considered within South Korean ruling circles, to varying degrees, for
decades. South Korea’s nuclear activities date back to the 1950s, but it
was not until the 1970s that the program took off.
In
late 1971, the military dictator Park Chung-hee, the current
president’s father, instructed his staff to draw up plans to develop
nuclear weapons. The following year, the US and South Korea signed
the 1972 Atomic Energy Agreement, under which Seoul purchased an
American nuclear reactor. However, once it became clear that Park was
eyeing the acquisition of nuclear weapons, Washington forced the South
Korean regime to sign an amended agreement in 1974 and ratify the
nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1975.
Despite
these treaties, the Park government’s program carried on for two more
years in secret in an effort to develop a nuclear bomb and a ballistic
missile, known as the Baekkom (White Bear), as the preferred delivery
system. In 1976, Park acquiesced to US pressure to give up the nuclear
weapons program.
Through
the latest agreement, Washington is again seeking to ensure that South
Korea remains dependent on the US “nuclear umbrella” and thus an
integral part of its military build-up throughout the Indo-Pacific
region against China.
No comments:
Post a Comment