World powers look for rigid restrictions on Iran’s centrifuge development in talks
Senior German official tells Haaretz that ‘R&D is a big deal,’ so that breakout time for bomb isn’t too quick.
“R&D
is a big deal,” said the official, who asked to remain anonymous due to
the diplomatic sensitivity of the negotiations. “The final deal must include clear restrictions on R&D, so that enrichment capacity does not go through the roof.”
The
official said the German government is in regular contact with its
Israeli counterpart over the nuclear negotiations, at the level of both
experts and politicians. National Security Adviser Yossi Cohen will
arrive in Berlin today for talks, with Iran top of the list.
The
issue of research and development is one of Israel’s primary concerns
about the emerging nuclear deal, which is supposed to be finalized by
June 30. Iran’s research on advanced centrifuges could significantly
shorten its breakout time – the time it would need to build a nuclear
weapon if it decided to eject UN inspectors and start enriching uranium
at full speed, to the necessary level of 90 percent.
Currently, Iran’s breakout time is about two to three months. Under the emerging deal between Iran and the P5+1, its breakout time is supposed to be at least a year for the next 10 years.
Most
of Iran’s centrifuges are older models, though it has a few newer
models that can enrich uranium three or four times faster. Under the
emerging deal, Iran would be able to use only its older centrifuges for
the first 10 years.
But
the Iranians are currently developing even more advanced models that
could enrich uranium six to eight times faster than the older ones.
Tehran is demanding that its R&D work on new centrifuges be allowed
to continue unhindered. But the six powers fear that if R&D
continues at the pace it has until now, then when the agreement expires,
Iran will have highly advanced centrifuges that would let it enrich
enough uranium for a bomb very quickly.
Two
weeks ago, the nuclear negotiations resumed in Vienna for the first
time since a framework deal was reached in Lausanne last month. Tehran
had been furious over the fact sheet the White House distributed on the
Lausanne framework. Consequently, the P5+1 had feared domestic pressure
might cause the Iranians to renege on some of the understandings, the
German official said. But that didn’t happen. “The last round of talks
in Vienna was positive,” he said. “There were concerns that the Iranians
might backtrack on some of the understandings from Lausanne, and they
didn’t.
“Lausanne
was a big step forward and we closed many gaps, and we have a good
basis for the last steps toward a comprehensive agreement,” he added.
“The feeling in Vienna was that everybody wants to get a deal by June
30, and that this is possible.”
But
R&D isn’t the only unresolved issue. Another is what powers
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors will have.
“Inspections and transparency are crucial,” the official said. “This
must not be a deal that gives Iran the benefit of the doubt. That is why
IAEA inspectors will get far-reaching access. However, the Iranians
know that we have red lines and that we will not give up our principles
just to get a deal,” he added. “The Iranians also need a deal, they must
deliver to their people.”
No comments:
Post a Comment