Blame It On Obama: US President Wants To Be Held Responsible If Iran Poses Nuclear Threat In Future
By Sounak Mukhopadhyay
on May 21 2015 2:06 PM EDT
By Sounak Mukhopadhyay
on May 21 2015 2:06 PM EDT
U.S.
President Barack Obama dismissed media reports that Saudi Arabia would
opt for nuclear power if Iran did so. He said that there was no
indication that other Persian Gulf nations wanted to pursue their own
nuclear programs.
Obama
said that a probable reason behind Gulf nations not opting for nuclear
power is that U.S. protection was a “far greater deterrent” than their
own nuclear capacity. The U.S. president added that Saudi Arabia among
other Gulf nations appeared satisfied. The Saudis seem convinced that a
deal between the U.S. and Iran would prevent Iran from posing a nuclear
threat to the region, he added.
Obama
said that he had a personal interest in finalizing a nuclear agreement
with Iran. “Look, 20 years from now, I’m still going to be around, God
willing,” Obama told the Atlantic. “ a nuclear weapon, it’s my name on this.”
Obama
also talked about the loss of Ramadi, Iraq, to fighters from the
Islamic State group. He dismissed the notion that the U.S. military was
losing against Islamic State group forces. He admitted, however, that
the U.S.-led coalition had suffered a “tactical setback” in Ramadi.
The
president said Ramadi had been vulnerable for a very long time. He
blamed the situation there on a lack of U.S.-trained Iraqi security
forces. He added that improvements in training were not happening fast
enough in the Sunni parts of Iraq.
Obama
said there was an important lesson to learn from U.S. involvement in
Iraq. According to Obama, Iraqi people are either not capable or not
willing to reach the “political accommodations” needed for governing the
country. Obama added that Americans would not be able to fight for
Iraq’s security if Iraqis were not willing to do it for themselves. The
Atlantic interview conducted Tuesday was released Thursday.
Some
U.S. officials have tried to portray that the defeat in Ramadi as not
very important because the city has been partially held by the Islamic
State group for the past 18 months. However, Financial
Times reported that Ramadi had left “a hole” in the confidence of the United States. Amman, Jordan, publisher Kirk Sowell wondered what difference 300 U.S. trainers could make to a “hollow” Iraqi division.
No comments:
Post a Comment