Reports: Iraq signs arms deal with Iran
The Iraqi government has been battling armed groups, who have taken over western Anbar province [EPA]
Iran has signed a deal to sell Iraq arms and ammunition worth $195m, according to documents seen by Reuters news agency – a move that would break a UN embargo on weapons sales by Iran.
The agreement was reached at the end of November, the documents showed, just weeks after Nouri al-Maliki, Iraq’s prime minister, returned from Washington, where he lobbied the Obama administration for extra weapons to fight armed rebels.
The official documents seen by Reuters showed that six of eight contracts were signed with Iran’s Defence Industries Organisation to supply Iraq with light and medium arms, mortar launchers, ammunition for tanks as well as artillery and mortars.
A final two contracts were agreed to with the state-owned Iran Electronic Industries for night vision goggles, communications equipment and mortar guiding devices.
One of the contracts includes equipment to protect against chemical agents.
The Obama administration pressed the Iraqi government on Monday to explain the media reports.
“We’ve certainly seen those reports. If true, this would raise serious concerns,” Jen Psaki, State Department spokeswoman, said.
She said that “any transfer of arms from Iran to a third country is in direct violation” of the UN embargo.
“We are seeking clarification on this matter from the government of Iraq and to ensure that Iraqi officials understand the limits that international law places on arms trade with Iran,” Psaki said.
Some in Washington are nervous about providing sensitive US military equipment to a country they worry is becoming too close to Iran. Several Iraqi legislators said Maliki had made the deal because he was fed up with delays to US arms deliveries.
Security troubles
A spokesman for Maliki would not confirm or deny the sale, but said such a deal would be understandable given Iraq’s current security troubles.
“We are launching a war against terrorism and we want to win this war. Nothing prevents us from buying arms and ammunition from any party and it’s only ammunition helping us to fight terrorists,” Ali Mussawi, the spokesman, said.
Three Iraqi legislators, who said they had knowledge of the deals, argued they were due to Maliki’s unhappiness with US response to his request to supply Iraq with arms and ammunition to fight armed groups.
The Iranian government denied any knowledge of a deal to sell arms to Iraq. It would be the first official arms deal between Shia Iran and Iraq’s Shia-led government and highlight the growing bond between them in the two years since the departure of US troops from Iraq.
One US official, told of Reuters’ findings, said such a deal could further complicate the US administration’s approach to negotiating with Iran on easing international sanctions over its nuclear programme, which the West suspects is aimed at producing bombs. Iran says its aims are purely peaceful.
“If true, this would raise serious concerns,” said the US official, who declined to be named. “Any transfer of arms from Iran to a third country is in direct violation of Iran’s obligations under UNSCR 1747.”
A UN diplomatic source close to the UN Security Council’s Iran sanctions committee was aware of the arms deal and voiced concern about it, while declining to disclose details about those concerns. The source spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity.
The Iraqi government has been battling armed groups, who have taken over western Anbar province [EPA]
Iran has signed a deal to sell Iraq arms and ammunition worth $195m, according to documents seen by Reuters news agency – a move that would break a UN embargo on weapons sales by Iran.
The agreement was reached at the end of November, the documents showed, just weeks after Nouri al-Maliki, Iraq’s prime minister, returned from Washington, where he lobbied the Obama administration for extra weapons to fight armed rebels.
The official documents seen by Reuters showed that six of eight contracts were signed with Iran’s Defence Industries Organisation to supply Iraq with light and medium arms, mortar launchers, ammunition for tanks as well as artillery and mortars.
A final two contracts were agreed to with the state-owned Iran Electronic Industries for night vision goggles, communications equipment and mortar guiding devices.
One of the contracts includes equipment to protect against chemical agents.
The Obama administration pressed the Iraqi government on Monday to explain the media reports.
“We’ve certainly seen those reports. If true, this would raise serious concerns,” Jen Psaki, State Department spokeswoman, said.
She said that “any transfer of arms from Iran to a third country is in direct violation” of the UN embargo.
“We are seeking clarification on this matter from the government of Iraq and to ensure that Iraqi officials understand the limits that international law places on arms trade with Iran,” Psaki said.
Some in Washington are nervous about providing sensitive US military equipment to a country they worry is becoming too close to Iran. Several Iraqi legislators said Maliki had made the deal because he was fed up with delays to US arms deliveries.
Security troubles
A spokesman for Maliki would not confirm or deny the sale, but said such a deal would be understandable given Iraq’s current security troubles.
“We are launching a war against terrorism and we want to win this war. Nothing prevents us from buying arms and ammunition from any party and it’s only ammunition helping us to fight terrorists,” Ali Mussawi, the spokesman, said.
Three Iraqi legislators, who said they had knowledge of the deals, argued they were due to Maliki’s unhappiness with US response to his request to supply Iraq with arms and ammunition to fight armed groups.
The Iranian government denied any knowledge of a deal to sell arms to Iraq. It would be the first official arms deal between Shia Iran and Iraq’s Shia-led government and highlight the growing bond between them in the two years since the departure of US troops from Iraq.
One US official, told of Reuters’ findings, said such a deal could further complicate the US administration’s approach to negotiating with Iran on easing international sanctions over its nuclear programme, which the West suspects is aimed at producing bombs. Iran says its aims are purely peaceful.
“If true, this would raise serious concerns,” said the US official, who declined to be named. “Any transfer of arms from Iran to a third country is in direct violation of Iran’s obligations under UNSCR 1747.”
A UN diplomatic source close to the UN Security Council’s Iran sanctions committee was aware of the arms deal and voiced concern about it, while declining to disclose details about those concerns. The source spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity.
No comments:
Post a Comment