Hollywood may have got it right after all.
Nasa and the National Nuclear Security Administration have announced they are now working together on the possibility of destroying hazardous asteroids using nuclear weapons.
And like the film Armageddon – where Bruce Willis flies a space shuttle to an oncoming asteroid to drill a warhead into its core – the nuclear payload could be delivered by rocket.
‘Often, these agencies focus on their own
pieces of the puzzle, so anything that brings them together is a good
thing,’ said Bruce Betts, director of science and technology at the
Planetary Society told the New York Times.
The resulting shock wave caused widespread
damage and injuries, making it the largest known natural object to have
entered the atmosphere since the 1908 Tunguska event, which destroyed a
forest area of Siberia.
Using a nuclear weapons to blow up
asteroids may work particularly well on medium-sized asteroids and
comets between 164 and 492 feet in diameter.
Some experts, however, claim that the
resulting rock fragments could make the situation worse, and that
deflecting an asteroid may prove to be a better solution.
Blowing up an asteroid with nuclear weapons has been proposed in the past.
Last year, an Iowa team outlined a similar
vision at a Nasa conference, and say they would need just a weeks’
notice to launch if the system were developed.
Called the Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle, or HAIV, the craft would rendezvous with an asteroid in deep space.
It consists of a leader spacecraft, which would hit the comet and create blast crater.
Around a millisecond later, a follower
spacecraft carrying nuclear explosives would hit inside the crater –
which increases its effectiveness by up to 20 times.
Over the past two decades, Nasa has been
looking for dangerous near-Earth asteroids larger than 1km in size, and
claims to have found 98 per cent of them.
In a session at the SXSW conference in
Texas last year, Nasa scientist Jason Kessler said: ‘The likelihood of
something hitting us in the future is pretty guaranteed, although we’re
not freaking out that there is an imminent threat.’
No comments:
Post a Comment